---
--- This should be in linux tutorial Morimoto, better explained.
I remember being written there that reiserfs is safer, with less chance of data corruption, since ext3 is a ext2 format coming from (this well was not insecure because jornalado). Therefore, ext3 probably inherits some of the problems of ext2, but in practice it works well, has not lost even a bit far.
The reiserfs not tested. ---
Seila already tried ext2 and ext3 reiserFS, what else was liked reiserFS
when you turn off the toe in linux, without shutdown, the ext2 or ext3 is more than 5 minutes passing the test data integrity, and not always able to restore it, now the show besides reiserFS h fast, when you disconnect the hard way, the integrity test it in the boot system is nearly of instant, already hung up several times in the reiserFS pq forcibly crashed in charge of q rc.6 was to shut down, give fingerprint was on the right, q thankfully never lost a file, never comrrompeu, I found it very safe reiserFS
t - - I think
reversed a little history.
journalled EXT3 is a FileSystem, fast, dynamic, where the level of fragmentation is minimilissimo, FS errors are corrected in seconds, is ideal and standard Linux (no wonder it ) (data can be easily recovered).
EXT2 did not have a system Journal, she was the file system of Linux pradão, despite these comments I heard about the EXT2 be unsafe ( unknown) here always used and never had problems with it.
RAISERFS is jornalizada is faster but less secure than EXT3, and it seems that in the event of data loss may not be possible to recover .. tbm fs is a very good, especially for machines that do not have a HD so fast. (Transfer rate is good) I use EXT3
really like and want to continue using this FS.
Hugs
Nenhum comentário:
Postar um comentário